was successfully added to your cart.

Subscribe to our newsletter

& get a copy of our new e-book
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Research Looks at Programs to Help Prevent Teen Depression

By Alyssa McCarthy, Ph.D. candidate, Rutgers University

Bullied Teen Alone

In short, what is the study about? 

Adolescence is a challenging period involving many physical, psychological, emotional, and social changes. This can be particularly difficult for teens facing particular stressors (e.g., poor healthcare access, academic problems) and mental health concerns.

Research indicates that depression rates increase alarmingly during adolescence. Teens who develop depression are at greater risk of a range of problems including failing out of school, unemployment, later depression, alcohol dependence, and suicide attempts. Fortunately, research teams have developed several effective programs to prevent teen depression. Yet, to reach vulnerable teens with these programs, they need to be provided in accessible settings, such as schools. Showing that depression prevention programs positively impact school-related outcomes (e.g., grades, attendance) may motivate schools to provide them. Despite the well-known connection between depression and lower academic achievement, there has been very little research on whether depression prevention programs improve school performance and functioning.

To explore the effects of school-based depression prevention programs, Dr. Jami Young and team conducted a large study called the Depression Prevention Initiative (DPI). Teens with depressive symptoms (e.g., sad and down, irritable) attended either Interpersonal Psychotherapy – Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST) or Group Counseling (GC) at their school. IPT-AST is an evidence-based group program based on the idea that our relationships affect our mood, which then affects our relationships. It focuses on educating teens about depression, promoting their positive relationships, and improving their problematic relationships. GC programs varied, because leaders were allowed to structure their groups however they preferred. According to the initial study on DPI, teens in both programs had improvements in their depressive symptoms and overall functioning, though teens in IPT-AST showed greater improvements (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27646462). This follow-up study explored whether IPT-AST and GC also improved grades, attendance rates, and/or disciplinary problems over one year.

What would be the most important take-home messages from the study?

Teens in IPT-AST and GC had similar outcomes in their grades and numbers of absences, tardies, and disciplinary problems. Although the results were similar in both programs, there was not a comparison group of teens who did not attend either program, so it is unclear whether teens would have had worse outcomes if they had not received some type of school-based mental health intervention. To look into this, we compared the changes in grades seen in our study to data reported from Chicago Public Schools. This comparison suggested that IPT-AST and GC may have prevented against the declines in grades seen during the teenage years. However, this finding is preliminary and needs to be confirmed in other studies.

Although teens in IPT-AST and GC had similar school-related outcomes, follow-up analyses indicated these prevention programs may have an important effect on students’ academic functioning. More specifically, we found that when teens’ depressive symptoms improved, their grades were relatively stable over the following year. On the other hand, teens whose depressive symptoms did not improve showed a decline in grades during that period.

How are these findings important in practice?

When the programs were successful in their primary goal to reduce depressive symptoms, teens also benefited in their academic performance. This is yet another reason to intervene early and effectively when teens show warning signs of developing depression.

To our knowledge, this was one of the first studies to explore school-related outcomes from depression prevention programs. Researchers need to continue examining these outcomes to better understand their academic benefits and bolster the argument for embedding depression prevention programs in schools. At the same time, we should more strongly emphasize students’ mental well-being as intrinsically important and highlight schools’ distinctive capacity to provide accessible mental health care to many young people.

What other studies can be recommended to further an understanding/application of the findings?  

Our team’s initial study on DPI provides more information about the programs and their mental health outcomes. Drs. Jami Young, Laura Mufson, and Christie Schueler also recently published a book on IPT-AST called Preventing Adolescent Depression: Interpersonal Psychotherapy – Adolescent Skills Training. More broadly, Dr. Mina Fazel and colleagues (2014) published review articles advocating for the integration of mental health care into schools to promote youths’ healthy development. 

External Links

Link to the article: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1063426617717739

Alyssa McCarthy’s LinkedIn Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alyssamccarthy/

About Alyssa McCarthy, Ph.D. candidate, Rutgers University

Alternative Text

Alyssa McCarthy is a doctoral candidate in the Clinical Psychology PhD Program at Rutgers University, where she works under the mentorship of Dr. Jami Young. She is interested in research focused on enhancing the identification, prevention, and treatment of youth mental health problems in diverse settings.

Alyssa McCarthy on the Web
More on: Depression, Parenting, Research
Latest update: December 6, 2017